But the real nightmare is the frontend. I know CSS/JS gurus coding with Emacs! While Emacs is a very nice operating system, it's unbelievable there's nothing better out there.
The idea of this post came from the recently announced release of the new version of WaveMaker visual studio, a "drag and drop" IDE for Ajax powered websites.
The arena of web 2.0 IDEs is full of competitors. Mind you, I will only name a few but feel free to drop me a comment if you know some more. I will do a little mixing between Ajax/Client oriented IDEs and IDES supporting server side languages, but that's exaclty the point: in the new Web 2.0 we need to use both! What's more, most IDEs are not just being, well, IDEs, but they're supporting their own framework with proprietary libraries, different standards and so on.
- Echo2 is a framework/ide aimed at Ajax and Rich Client development. It's obviously java based, and provides a nice and easy environment for the developer. I can't help but feel a "blackbox" look around echo-based applications.
- qooxdoo is a complete framework for Ajax: it does not require any knowledge of html, css or whatever, being a huge juggernaut with its own libraries and a development environmente completely masquerading the underlying structure. Server side, it supports PHP, Perl and Java. Did I mention there's no debugging?
- Morfik WebOS AppsBuilder is a another complete framework for ajax, featuring a visual environment for page building and browser side debugging via FireBug. And when I say complete I mean it: Morfik is a complete RAD tool, so you are either going to love it or hate it.
- Eclipse PDT project is an Eclipse plugin powering the development of PHP code. It's still not very mature, but will eventually support complete debugging (it does, actually, by now, but it's a little tricky to setup) and it's my IDE of choice, by the way.
- RDT is a complete Eclipse plugin for Ruby On Rails development.Nothing to say here, it's probably the IDE of choice of most Ruby developers.
- Zend Studio should be a bigger player. It's Eclipse based now, supporting unit testing (finally!) and proper debugging. But yet, its relatively high price is a huge stop for buyers: most PHP guys nowaday were coding alone yesterday and could not afford Studio. The result is that they don't need it now, and they probably won't tomorrow. Bad move, Zend.
- Netbeans has a surprisingly good support for Ruby on Rails, including debugging, semantic analysis and so on.
- 4D's ajax support is a nice addition to the 4D suite. I must admit I never quite got to know 4D, being it a little too "closed minded" for me, so I'm just mentioning it here.
But wait: how comes we are speaking about web 2.0 IDEs and we are not mentioning any IDE that is actually 2.0? Well, here you are:
- Heroku is a feature-full, powerful and scalable ide for developing Ruby on Rails applications directly on the web. Heroku will take care of everything from giving you an IDE to actually running the applications in production. That's a tremendous improvement, but yet... you will be missing the most advanced features of a fulle IDE (debugging, call tracking and so on).
Conclusions: while we have dozens of players and softwares, not only we're missing the ultimate IDE, but most environments don't support even the most fundamental features that programmers have became accustomed to.
Debugging, proper testing and continuos integration are nowhere to be found in the brave new web.
The next time your favourite web application goes mad, you know why.
Update: after a quick test, I've added 4D and Netbeans. Thanks go to freakface and Mickael (even if he is now using gedit).